Buddhism Behind Bars
By
Graeme Lyall AM
Many
people incarcerated in the prison
system see a need for spiritual guidance, whether it be from priests,
nuns,
monks or lay teachers.
In
the United States there are several
Buddhist organizations involved in prison chaplaincy. They include the
Prison
Dharma Network in Boulder , Colorado, the Engaged Zen Foundation and
Flowering
Dogwood both founded in 1996 by Venerable Kobutsu Malone whose aim was
to
foster contemplative meditation practice in prisons. There is some
resistance
to Buddhist prison chaplaincy, especially in the Southern States, by
some
Christian chaplains, however, Buddhist chaplains are free to serve the
prison
population in several other more enlightened States.
In
Taiwan, Chen Yung-Chuan suffered a
stroke that left him paralised as a result of which he became suicidal.
He was
later imprisoned for theft but, due to his stroke he was completely
paralised
and was unable even to speak. He was taken by Venerable Master Chan Kung
to a Buddhist Compassion Centre, the Ta-chueh
Tsung-hsin-hui, which he had established to provide shelter for people
in need
and to help to give them a new start in life.
Master Chan Kung was a former gangster involved in a crime
syndicate.
Many of those helped by this centre were criminals sent there by the
Tainan
Detention Centre and the Taiwan After-care Centre.
Master Chan Kung felt that no one should be
abandoned so he took Chen Yung-Chuan to his centre so that he could be
cared
for. Another former criminal, Wu Tung-hsing, who lived at the centre
took Chen
under his wing. Due to his paralysis,
Chen was incontinent and was unable to control his bodily functions.
None of the other residents at the centre
wanted to have anything to do with Chen. It was only Wu Tung-hsing who
had the
compassion to care for him. This was due to his great interest in
studying and
practicing Buddhism. He constantly
prayed for Chen that his normal life be restored to him. Eventually,
Chen
showed signs of improvement in his condition. One day, Chen, who was
previously
unable to speak, uttered the Buddhist mantra, ‘Om Mani Padme Hum’.
This astounded and delighted both Wu
Tung-hsing and Master Chan Kung and they attributed this improvement in
his
condition to the power of Buddhism. Although he is still in the process
of
rehabilitation, Chen has decided to devote his time to the study of
Buddhism.
So that he could reduce the burden of his need for care, each day he
struggles
up and down the stairs to improve his mobility. He has decided that
when he had
recovered sufficiently, he would accompany Master Chan Kung in his
visits to
prisons throughout Taiwan so that he can relate the story of his
recovery to
other prisoners.
Australia's
European settlement
commenced in 1788, as a prison to house 'criminals' deported from
England. They
were transported to Port Jackson, the former name of Sydney Harbour,
many for
such minor offences as stealing a loaf of bread, which they needed to
survive.
Arriving
with
the First Fleet was a Chaplain, appointed by King George the 3rd
,
named Reverend Richard Johnson. He was less than sympathetic to the
plight of
the convicts for whom he was supposed to provide comfort and spiritual
guidance.
In a letter to a friend written from Sydney Cove on the 15th
of
November 1788, he wrote:
"Happy
would I be were I to live upon bread & water and to suffer the most
severe
hardship, did I but see some of those poor souls begin to think about
their
latter end. Am sorry to see so little good yet done amongst them. They
neither see
nor will be persuaded to seek the Lord of Mercy and Compassion of God.
They prefer
their Lust before their souls, yea, most of them will sell their souls
for a Glass
of Grogg(sic), so blind, so foolish, so
hardened are they."
Such
sentiments would be unworthy of today's
prison chaplains. Their job is to be
non‑judgemental of those in their care. Judgements should be left to
the courts
and not those who are serving the spiritual needs of inmates. Chaplains
would
rarely know of the crime of the inmates they are serving. They should
accept
people as they find them.
I
have been a Buddhist chaplain in the New South Wales correctional
system for
the past six years but I am aware of the crimes of very few of the
inmates to
whom I come into contact. I have no fear in being in the presence of
prison
inmates. I treat them with respect and they reciprocate. Although I
have
occasionally heard swearing as I have passed by some cell blocks, 1 can
honestly report that I have never heard, even mild swearing, from the
inmates
when I am with them. They are very respectful and I enjoy their
company.
Perhaps this may be due to the fact that the toughest and roughest
inmates
don't bother to seek the company or counseling of a chaplain. Many of
the
inmates with whom I have contact are in prison for drug related crimes,
however, others are serving sentences for murder, rape, theft and such
minor
crimes as culpable driving and tax evasion. One prisoner, of whom I am
very
proud, seems to have made a remarkable change in his behaviour. 1 met
him at
Parklea Gaol, a maximum security prison in Sydney's western suburbs. He
was in
segregation, (solitary confinement) and I was informed by the officers
that he
was extremely dangerous and that I would have to speak to him through
the bars.
I visited him each week and discussed what he had been reading in the
books
that I had given him. He had underlined certain passages and I
attempted to
clarify the meaning. He demonstrated a very intelligent and analytical
approach. I suggested to him that he should consider university
studies. He
reported that, at that gaol, there were few opportunities for
education. One
book that I gave him had a profound impression on him. It was "Changing
Destiny" by Venerable Master Chin Kung. The prisoner said, "Whoever
wrote this book is a genius." I informed him that I was seeing that
genius
the following weekend and I asked him if he would like to have his book
signed.
He was delighted. 1 reported this to Master Chin Kung who wrote the
Chinese character
for 'love' in the book. This prisoner was later transferred to Goulburn
Gaol,
the state's highest security prison. He
sent me a letter which I found most moving. It said:
"When I first met you at Parklea
Correctional Centre, I was in segregation (solitary confinement) and
lived in
the unknown. Not knowing the outcome of my future, every week you made
sure
that you took time out to visit me. I never forgot that and it had a
profound
effect on me. I saw in you a man who had given so much of yourself to
those of
all walks of life, including someone like me. I enjoyed our talks
and learned aspects of myself that
set me on a new course. Part of that new course came to me by a book
you gave
me, "Changing Destiny" by Master Chin Kung, which you had signed by
Master Chin Kung with one word "Love". I was then transferred to
Goulburn Correctional Centre. I decided on two things I would change in
my
life. I would change in my life to never return to prison. The reason
being
twofold.
1.
That one word from Master Chin Kung
"Love". I wanted to repay my mother for all my time lost to her with
"Love". I owe her so much and her karma is owed so much for
everything she has sacrificed for me. I want her to spend her later
years being
proud of me.
2. 1
wanted other inmates to have the
opportunity to find some guidance in Buddhism as I had. When I arrived
at
Goulburn Prison, the first thing I did was write to you to seek your
assistance
in setting up a Buddhist Study Group. You put me in contact with Paddy
Murray.
I wrote to Paddy Murray and, after a lot of negotiations with
Corrective
Services, we now have a Buddhist Practice and Philosophy Programme.
Also, Paddy
Murray is now the Buddhist Chaplain. This programme is going very
well."
I
found this letter so touching that I
want to share it with many people. The lesson to be learnt from this
letter is
don't write people off. Everybody is a potential Buddha ‑ even
prisoners.
There
is an epilogue to this story. This
prisoner applied to the University of Southern Queensland for admission
as an
external student. As he had left school at year eleven, they set him
five
essays to complete. He did such a ‑great ‑job with these essays that
they
offered him a scholarship. I'm sure that if he completes his degree and
refrains from further crime, his mother will be truly proud of him and
so will
I.
I find that the majority of prisoners
come from dysfunctional
families or
they have left school too early. I once mentioned to the prisoners that
gaol
was an unpleasant place and that they should try to avoid committing
further
crimes following their release. I was shocked to hear one young inmate
say
"I like being in gaol. I have learned to read and write since I have
been
here and I have completed year eleven." I told him that year eleven was
not enough to guarantee him a job on his release. He should try to
complete his
HSC. He replied that he could not progress beyond year eleven in that
gaol as
they had no facilities for further education. This is very sad and it
is not
surprising that so many prisoners re‑offend. Another point for
consideration
is: what sort of life this young man must have led prior to his
incarceration
to make him remark that he likes being in gaol? He told me on a later
occasion
that he was raped as a child. His story is so sad. Crime is often a
cause, with
inmates, of survival in a world where employment is not open to them.
This
is why, I feel, that the emphasis
in imprisonment should be educational rather than penal. I will say
more about
this later. At this stage I want to relate a couple of amusing
incidents that I
encountered in my work. I was emphasising to
the group that, to make spiritual progress,
it is important to cultivate, what we refer to in Buddhism as Kalyana
Mitra, a
spiritual friend or good friend. One inmate said, "Do you mean an
accomplice?" Not Quite!
I
usually take a box of Chinese sesame
egg rolls into the gaol to share with the boys. One prisoner said, "My
father is a Catholic and my mother is a Buddhist. Is it O'k for me to
attend
both?" I told him that he should use whatever teaching helps him so he
should attend both. He said, "When I attend your class, I get egg rolls
but when I go to mass, all I get is a wafer." I informed the Christian
chaplain who said that she would make sure she had chocolate biscuits
on
Sundays in future. On another occasion, I was teaching the prisoners
about the
Buddhist moral precepts which include not killing and refraining from
alcohol
and drugs which distort the mind. One prisoner asked me if it was
breaking the
precepts if he had a gun. I told him that guns are for killing and so,
indeed,
it is breaking a precept. He responded by saying that he needed a gun
to
protect himself. I told him that if he didn't get involved in crime, he
wouldn't need to protect himself. I told him that I don't get involved
in crime
so I never need to carry a gun. He then said, "I don't take drugs but I
sell them. Is that breaking a precept?" I again pointed out to him that
drugs kill people so, again, he is breaking a precept. It amazed me how
some
inmates try to justify their criminal behaviour.
I was
attending a vigil, last year,
organised by the Ministry of Peace, on United Nations Day. One of the
speakers
was Dr.Arthur Chesterfield Evans, a former Member of the New South
Wales Upper
House. He pointed out that it costs the New South Wales taxpayer
$73,000 each
year to keep each prisoner in gaol. This
is an astounding sum but not surprising when the salaries of officers,
support
staff, medical staff, food and accommodation are taken into
consideration. He
suggested that, for that amount of money, he could house each prisoner
in a
three star hotel and pay their university fees. I mentioned earlier
that many
prisoners lack education and educational facilities in prisons are
totally
inadequate. However, I feel that Dr. Chesterfield Evans's suggestion,
although
well meaning, is impractical. Were his suggestion to be implemented, I
would
find it a great incentive to commit a crime myself so that I could
participate
in such a scheme. It would not be a deterrent to crime but an
incentive.
However, I think that gaols, for minor crimes, should not be penal
institutions
but educational institutions. More money should be spent in encouraging
such
bodies as TAFE and universities to establish centres for the further
education
of prisoners. If the prisoners leave gaol with a certificate or a
degree, there
would be less chance of their re‑offending. It has been proved that
punishment
doesn't work. I learnt this when I was studying psychology. Education
is the answer.
It would not work on all prisoners but it could change the lives and
attitudes
of many. Why is this not being done? Inadequate funds are being
allocated by
the governments to institute such a scheme. Politicians find no votes
in the
welfare of prisoners so they prefer to lock them up and forget about
them.
Being 'tough on crime' is a sure election winner and political parties
vie with
each other to see who can be the toughest. Faith communities have a
great
influence on politicians. It was faith communities who were responsible
for the
first universities so they are well aware of the importance of
education. It
is, perhaps, up to the faith communities to lobby politicians to
institute such
a scheme and rescue some young lives from a life of crime and
subsequent
incarceration. I am not a apologist for criminals. There are many
people in
gaol who are a real danger to society and society must be protected
from them
but most of the inmates that I encounter are decent young men who have
committed a stupid act which has landed them in trouble. I have asked
many of
the prisoners if they would appreciate more time spent on education.
Many told
me that the main thing that they learn in gaol is how to be better
criminals.
On release, many find it hard to survive partly due to their lack of
skills and
lack of opportunity for employment due to the stigma of their
incarceration and
they go on to commit further crimes.
This
is not always the case but it is a
common cause of reoffending. Rather than building more gaols, perhaps
we should
look for the reason for offending, Often we will find that it lies in
the lack
of education, not only in educational institutions but at home. Proper
moral
guidance from parents would avoid the shame of having their offspring
later being
incarcerated.
In
Western Australia, prison chaplaincy is
conducted by Venerable Ajahn Brahmavamso
from the Bodhinyana Monastery in Serpentine, near Perth. He relates a
story of
one prisoner, whom he was serving, regularly protesting his innocence
of the
crime for which he was serving time. Ajahn Brahmavamso gained the
impression
that this particular prisoner was telling the truth so he offered to
enlist the
assistance of a barrister friend to try to appeal his case. However the
prisoner declined the offer saying that he had committed worse crimes
for which
he hadn’t been caught so he was happy to continue serving his sentence.
On
another occasion the prisoners asked him about the daily routine at his
monastery. He said, “Well, we get up at 3.00 a.m.”. They said in
amazement,
“3.00a.m.?”. “Well,” he said, “We can get up earlier if we want to.” He
continued, “We then do chanting and practice meditation and, if there
is food
available, we have breakfast. After breakfast we clean up around the
monastery
until our final meal for the day at 11.00 a.m. In the afternoon we may
have
visitors and in the evening we have more chanting and meditation until
we
retire at 9.00 p.m.” The prisoners asked, “Do you have a radio or
television?”
“No!” was his reply. “Do you have a comfortable bed?” they asked. “No!
Just a
mat on the floor” he responded. They said “Why don’t you come and stay
with us?
It’s much more comfortable here.” I
should point out that most prisoners have television in their cells.
This may
seem to be providing luxury to prisoners but it is used as a deterrent
to
problem behavior. If the prisoners misbehave, the television privilege
is
removed until they decide to conform to the rules.
The
Chinese have a classic Confucian
text, Di Zi
Gui, "Guide to a Happy Life",
which is being taught to
inmates in Hai Nan in China with positive results. I distribute this
text in
the appropriate language – English, Chinese or Vietnamese – to several
prisoners in the gaols that I visit. Unfortunately, many people in
today’s
society do not respect their fellow humans. If this classic were taught
in our schools,
criminal behavior would be significantly reduced.
Some
courtesies of the
past, such
as a male allowing a woman to go first, standing when a woman enters a
room,
walking on the outside of a pavement to protect a woman from possible
splashing
by passing vehicles, raising one’s hat when passing a woman are not
necessarily
symbolic of paternalism detracting from the equality of
women. They
are expressions of respect for a fellow human being.
Western society could
well examine
the values taught by traditional Chinese moral education
and adapt and apply some of these principles
to rectify the deterioration of our modern societal values. This could
well
result in a harmonious society with a resultant reduction in
delinquency and
our increasing crime rate.